gary: be a part of indiana

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.58
, man
Weight: 0.57
, people
Weight: 0.55
, town
Weight: 0.54
, character
Weight: 0.54
Siblings michael
Weight: 0.35
, gordon
Weight: 0.35
, johnson
Weight: 0.35
, dave
Weight: 0.35
, paul
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be a part of indiana 1.00
be at michigan 0.83
be at utah 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(town, be at utah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gary, be a part of indiana)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gary, be a part of indiana)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(gary, be a part of indiana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(town, be at michigan)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(gary, be a part of indiana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(town, be at utah)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(gary, be a part of indiana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(town, be at michigan)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(gary, be a part of indiana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(town, be at utah)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(gary, be a part of indiana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(gary, be a part of indiana)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(town, be at utah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(gary, be a part of indiana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(gary, be a part of indiana)

Salient implies Plausible

0.08
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(gary, be a part of indiana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(gary, be a part of indiana)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(gary, be a part of indiana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gary, be a part of indiana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(gary, be a part of indiana)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(gary, be a part of indiana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gary, be a part of indiana)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(gary, be a part of indiana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(town, be at utah)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(gary, be a part of indiana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(town, be at michigan)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(gary, be a part of indiana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(town, be at utah)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(gary, be a part of indiana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(town, be at michigan)