gazelle: be at observation of danger

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, prey
Weight: 0.59
, antelope
Weight: 0.58
, animal
Weight: 0.57
, wildlife
Weight: 0.50
Siblings cheetah
Weight: 0.36
, rhino
Weight: 0.35
, zebra
Weight: 0.35
, hare
Weight: 0.35
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at observation of danger 1.00
sense danger 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(animal, sense danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(gazelle, be at observation of danger)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(gazelle, be at observation of danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(animal, sense danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, be at observation of danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(animal, sense danger)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(animal, sense danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(gazelle, be at observation of danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(gazelle, be at observation of danger)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(gazelle, be at observation of danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(gazelle, be at observation of danger)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(gazelle, be at observation of danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gazelle, sense danger)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(gazelle, be at observation of danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(gazelle, sense danger)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(gazelle, be at observation of danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, sense danger)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(gazelle, be at observation of danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(gazelle, sense danger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(gazelle, be at observation of danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(gazelle, be at observation of danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, be at observation of danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(gazelle, be at observation of danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(gazelle, be at observation of danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, be at observation of danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(animal, sense danger)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(gazelle, be at observation of danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(animal, sense danger)