gender: be base of social inequality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents determinant
Weight: 0.64
, trait
Weight: 0.63
, concept
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.61
Siblings sex
Weight: 0.34
, inequality
Weight: 0.33
, factor
Weight: 0.33
, geography
Weight: 0.33
, color
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be base of social inequality 1.00
affect income inequality 0.89
is social 0.81
be important dimension of social stratification 0.79
affect equality 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(inequality, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(gender, be base of social inequality)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gender, affect income inequality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(gender, affect income inequality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(gender, affect income inequality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(gender, affect income inequality)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(gender, be important dimension of social stratification)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(gender, is social)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(gender, be important dimension of social stratification)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(gender, affect equality)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(gender, be important dimension of social stratification)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(gender, is social)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gender, be important dimension of social stratification)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(gender, affect equality)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(gender, is social)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(gender, is social)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(gender, affect equality)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(gender, affect equality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(gender, be base of social inequality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(gender, be base of social inequality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(gender, be base of social inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, is social)