gender: is neutral language

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents determinant
Weight: 0.64
, trait
Weight: 0.63
, concept
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.61
Siblings sex
Weight: 0.34
, inequality
Weight: 0.33
, factor
Weight: 0.33
, geography
Weight: 0.33
, color
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is neutral language 1.00
is neutral language important 0.98
is neutral language important as means reducing 0.87
is language 0.83
is language important 0.83
affect language 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(factor, affect language)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(factor, affect language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(factor, affect language)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(gender, is neutral language)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(gender, is language)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(gender, is neutral language important)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(gender, is neutral language important)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(gender, affect language)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(gender, affect language)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(gender, is neutral language important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(gender, is neutral language important)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(gender, affect language)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(gender, is language)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(gender, is language important)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(gender, is language)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(gender, is language important)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(gender, is language important)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(gender, is language important)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(gender, is language)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(gender, affect language)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(gender, is neutral language)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(gender, is neutral language)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(gender, is neutral language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(factor, affect language)