gender: is neutral language important as means reducing

Property	Similarity
is neutral language important as means reducing	1.00
is neutral language important	0.90
is neutral language	0.87
is language important	0.82
affect language	0.78
is language	0.76

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(gender, is neutral language)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(gender, is neutral language)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(gender, affect language)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(gender, is neutral language)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(gender, is language)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(gender, is neutral language important)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(gender, is neutral language important)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(gender, is neutral language important)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(gender, affect language)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(gender, is neutral language)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Salient(gender, affect language)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(gender, is language important)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(gender, is language)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(gender, is neutral language important)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(gender, is language)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(gender, is language important)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(gender, is language important)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(gender, is language important)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(gender, affect language)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(gender, is neutral language important as means reducing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(gender, is language)

Parents	determinant Weight: 0.64 , trait Weight: 0.63 , concept Weight: 0.62 , subject Weight: 0.62 , issue Weight: 0.61
Siblings	sex Weight: 0.34 , inequality Weight: 0.33 , factor Weight: 0.33 , geography Weight: 0.33 , color Weight: 0.32

gender: is neutral language important as means reducing

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings