general: were in contempt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commander
Weight: 0.61
, person
Weight: 0.58
, rank
Weight: 0.58
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.57
, partner
Weight: 0.56
Siblings governor general
Weight: 0.34
, lieutenant general
Weight: 0.34
, manager
Weight: 0.33
, public servant
Weight: 0.32
, deputy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
were in contempt 1.00
were in contempt of germain 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(general, were in contempt)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(general, were in contempt)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(general, were in contempt)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(general, were in contempt of germain)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(general, were in contempt)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(general, were in contempt of germain)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(general, were in contempt)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(general, were in contempt of germain)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(general, were in contempt)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(general, were in contempt of germain)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(general, were in contempt)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(general, were in contempt)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(general, were in contempt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(general, were in contempt)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(general, were in contempt)