geography: was different from nubian geography

Related concepts

Parents	science Weight: 0.65 , subject Weight: 0.64 , department Weight: 0.64 , culture Weight: 0.63 , discipline Weight: 0.63
Siblings	computer science Weight: 0.36 , mathematics Weight: 0.36 , meteorology Weight: 0.34 , biology Weight: 0.34 , ecology Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was different from nubian geography	1.00
be called geography	0.94
be related to geography	0.93
affect physical geography	0.91
be compared to european geography	0.84
be different	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(science, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(geography, was different from nubian geography)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(culture, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(geography, was different from nubian geography)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(culture, be different)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(science, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(science, be different)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(culture, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(biology, be different)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(science, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(geography, was different from nubian geography)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(culture, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(geography, was different from nubian geography)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(biology, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(biology, be different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(geography, was different from nubian geography)

Similarity expansion

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(geography, be called geography)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(geography, be called geography)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(geography, affect physical geography)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(geography, be called geography)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(geography, be related to geography)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(geography, affect physical geography)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(geography, be related to geography)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(geography, affect physical geography)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(geography, be related to geography)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(geography, be compared to european geography)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(geography, be compared to european geography)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(geography, be compared to european geography)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to geography)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(geography, be called geography)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(geography, affect physical geography)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(geography, be compared to european geography)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(geography, was different from nubian geography)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(geography, was different from nubian geography)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(culture, be different)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(science, be different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(biology, be different)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(culture, be different)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(geography, was different from nubian geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(science, be different)