gerbil: chatter teeth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.65
, rodent
Weight: 0.56
, pet
Weight: 0.55
, cat
Weight: 0.46
, reptile
Weight: 0.46
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.35
, hamster
Weight: 0.35
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.35
, llama
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
chatter teeth 1.00
have long teeth 0.77
have yellow teeth 0.76
lose teeth 0.75
has physical part teeth 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(rodent, have yellow teeth)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(gerbil, chatter teeth)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(gerbil, chatter teeth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(rodent, have yellow teeth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, have yellow teeth)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part teeth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(llama, has physical part teeth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hamster, has physical part teeth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(rodent, have yellow teeth)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(gerbil, chatter teeth)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(gerbil, chatter teeth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hamster, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(hamster, has physical part teeth)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(llama, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(llama, has physical part teeth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(gerbil, chatter teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(gerbil, lose teeth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(gerbil, lose teeth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, lose teeth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have yellow teeth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(gerbil, lose teeth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(gerbil, have yellow teeth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(gerbil, have yellow teeth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(gerbil, has physical part teeth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gerbil, have yellow teeth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(gerbil, has physical part teeth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gerbil, have long teeth)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(gerbil, has physical part teeth)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(gerbil, have long teeth)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, chatter teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(gerbil, chatter teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rodent, have yellow teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(llama, has physical part teeth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hamster, has physical part teeth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(gerbil, chatter teeth)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rodent, have yellow teeth)