gerbil: have long teeth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.65
, rodent
Weight: 0.56
, pet
Weight: 0.55
, cat
Weight: 0.46
, reptile
Weight: 0.46
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.35
, hamster
Weight: 0.35
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.35
, llama
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have long teeth 1.00
has physical part teeth 0.91
have yellow teeth 0.90
lose teeth 0.88
have long tails 0.78
has physical part whiskers 0.78
chatter teeth 0.77
has physical part tails 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gerbil, have long teeth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gerbil, have long teeth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gerbil, have long teeth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(cat, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gerbil, have long teeth)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(rodent, have yellow teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gerbil, have long teeth)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gerbil, have long teeth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gerbil, have long teeth)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pet, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gerbil, have long teeth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pet, has physical part whiskers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(rodent, have yellow teeth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(cat, has physical part tails)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, have yellow teeth)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pet, has physical part whiskers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part tails)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(llama, has physical part teeth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(spider monkey, have long tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(spider monkey, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hamster, has physical part teeth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(hamster, has physical part whiskers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hamster, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(rodent, have yellow teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(cat, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pet, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hamster, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(hamster, has physical part teeth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(llama, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(llama, has physical part teeth)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(hamster, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(hamster, has physical part whiskers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(spider monkey, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(spider monkey, have long tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(hamster, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hamster, has physical part tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(spider monkey, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(spider monkey, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(gerbil, have long teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(gerbil, lose teeth)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(gerbil, lose teeth)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, lose teeth)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have yellow teeth)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(gerbil, have yellow teeth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(gerbil, lose teeth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(gerbil, have yellow teeth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(gerbil, has physical part teeth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(gerbil, has physical part teeth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(gerbil, chatter teeth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gerbil, have yellow teeth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(gerbil, chatter teeth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(gerbil, has physical part teeth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, chatter teeth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(gerbil, chatter teeth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long tails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(gerbil, have long tails)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(gerbil, has physical part tails)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part tails)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(gerbil, have long tails)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(gerbil, has physical part tails)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(gerbil, have long tails)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gerbil, has physical part tails)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gerbil, have long teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pet, has physical part whiskers)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rodent, have yellow teeth)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part tails)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(llama, has physical part teeth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hamster, has physical part teeth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(spider monkey, have long tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(hamster, has physical part whiskers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(spider monkey, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(hamster, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pet, has physical part whiskers)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rodent, have yellow teeth)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part tails)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(gerbil, have long teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)