rodent: has physical part tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, mammal
Weight: 0.64
, vertebrate
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings beaver
Weight: 0.77
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.76
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.72
, rabbit
Weight: 0.69
, house mouse
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tails 1.00
has physical part teeth 0.82
have bare tails 0.81
has physical part testicles 0.79
has physical part eyes 0.79
has physical part balls 0.78
has physical part incisors 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(beaver, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(beaver, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(beaver, has physical part tails)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has physical part tails)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(beaver, has physical part teeth)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(rodent, has physical part tails)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(rodent, have bare tails)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(rodent, have bare tails)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(rodent, have bare tails)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(rodent, have bare tails)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(rodent, has physical part balls)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part balls)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part balls)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(rodent, has physical part incisors)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part incisors)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part balls)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part incisors)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(rodent, has physical part testicles)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part testicles)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part testicles)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part testicles)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part eyes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(beaver, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(beaver, has physical part teeth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)