rodent: has physical part balls

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, mammal
Weight: 0.64
, vertebrate
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings beaver
Weight: 0.77
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.76
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.72
, rabbit
Weight: 0.69
, house mouse
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part balls 1.00
have big balls 0.91
has physical part tails 0.78
has physical part teeth 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part balls)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part balls)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(beaver, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part balls)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part balls)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(beaver, has physical part teeth)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(beaver, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(beaver, has physical part tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has physical part tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(rodent, has physical part balls)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(rodent, have big balls)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(rodent, have big balls)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(rodent, have big balls)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(rodent, have big balls)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part balls)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part balls)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(beaver, has physical part teeth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(beaver, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)