rodent: has physical part incisors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, mammal
Weight: 0.64
, vertebrate
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings beaver
Weight: 0.77
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.76
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.72
, rabbit
Weight: 0.69
, house mouse
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part incisors 1.00
have large incisors 0.95
has physical part teeth 0.85
has physical part testicles 0.79
has physical part tails 0.78
have yellow teeth 0.78
has physical part eyes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part incisors)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part incisors)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part incisors)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(beaver, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part incisors)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part incisors)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part incisors)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(beaver, has physical part teeth)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(beaver, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(beaver, has physical part tails)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has physical part tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(rodent, has physical part incisors)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(rodent, have large incisors)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(rodent, have large incisors)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(rodent, have large incisors)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(rodent, have large incisors)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, have yellow teeth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part testicles)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part testicles)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(rodent, has physical part testicles)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part testicles)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rodent, have yellow teeth)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(rodent, have yellow teeth)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(rodent, have yellow teeth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part eyes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part incisors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(beaver, has physical part teeth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(beaver, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rodent, has physical part incisors) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)