giant panda: be important to china

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.68
, endangered species
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, mammal
Weight: 0.62
, bear
Weight: 0.60
Siblings red panda
Weight: 0.80
, panda
Weight: 0.40
, panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, orangutan
Weight: 0.37
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to china 1.00
live in china 0.91
be important to chinese 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(panda, be important to china)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be important to china)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(red panda, live in china)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(panda, live in china)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(red panda, live in china)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(red panda, live in china)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(panda, live in china)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(panda, live in china)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(panda bear, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(panda bear, be important to china)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(panda, be important to china)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(giant panda, be important to china)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(giant panda, live in china)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(giant panda, live in china)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, live in china)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(giant panda, live in china)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to chinese)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(giant panda, be important to chinese)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be important to chinese)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(giant panda, be important to chinese)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(giant panda, be important to china)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(panda bear, be important to china)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(panda, be important to china)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(red panda, live in china)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to china)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(panda, live in china)