giant panda: be important to world

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.68
, endangered species
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, mammal
Weight: 0.62
, bear
Weight: 0.60
Siblings red panda
Weight: 0.80
, panda
Weight: 0.40
, panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, orangutan
Weight: 0.37
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to world 1.00
be important to us 0.79
be important to people 0.79
be important to environment 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bear, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(giant panda, be important to world)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bear, be important to environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(bear, be important to environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be important to world)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(spider monkey, be important to environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bear, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be important to world)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(red panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(red panda, be important to world)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(spider monkey, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(spider monkey, be important to environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(giant panda, be important to world)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(giant panda, be important to us)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(giant panda, be important to people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(giant panda, be important to environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to us)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be important to environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be important to us)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(giant panda, be important to environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be important to people)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(giant panda, be important to us)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(giant panda, be important to people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to world)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(giant panda, be important to world)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(bear, be important to environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(red panda, be important to world)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(spider monkey, be important to environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(giant panda, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(bear, be important to environment)