giant panda: be important to people

Related concepts

Parents	animal Weight: 0.68 , endangered species Weight: 0.68 , species Weight: 0.66 , mammal Weight: 0.62 , bear Weight: 0.60
Siblings	red panda Weight: 0.80 , panda Weight: 0.40 , panda bear Weight: 0.39 , orangutan Weight: 0.37 , spider monkey Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important to people	1.00
be important to us	0.86
be important to man	0.80
be important to world	0.79
react to people	0.76
be important to environment	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(bear, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(giant panda, be important to people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(bear, be important to environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(bear, be important to environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(panda, be important to man)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(spider monkey, be important to environment)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(red panda, be important to world)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(bear, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(giant panda, be important to people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(panda, be important to man) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(panda, be important to man)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(red panda, be important to world) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(red panda, be important to world)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(spider monkey, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(spider monkey, be important to environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(giant panda, be important to people)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(giant panda, be important to us)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(giant panda, be important to us)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(giant panda, be important to man)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(giant panda, be important to us)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(giant panda, be important to man)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(giant panda, be important to people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(bear, be important to environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(panda, be important to man)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(red panda, be important to world)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(spider monkey, be important to environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(giant panda, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(bear, be important to environment)