giant panda: be important to man

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.68
, endangered species
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, mammal
Weight: 0.62
, bear
Weight: 0.60
Siblings red panda
Weight: 0.80
, panda
Weight: 0.40
, panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, orangutan
Weight: 0.37
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to man 1.00
be important to people 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, be important to man)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(giant panda, be important to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(panda, be important to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(panda, be important to man)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(giant panda, be important to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(giant panda, be important to man)

Similarity expansion

0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(giant panda, be important to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(giant panda, be important to people)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(giant panda, be important to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to people)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(giant panda, be important to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be important to people)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(giant panda, be important to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(giant panda, be important to people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(giant panda, be important to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(giant panda, be important to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to man)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(giant panda, be important to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(giant panda, be important to man)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(panda, be important to man)