panda: be important to man

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.71
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, bear
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.41
, giant panda
Weight: 0.40
, red panda
Weight: 0.40
, orangutan
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to man 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, be important to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to man)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(panda, be important to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(giant panda, be important to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be important to man)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(panda, be important to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(panda, be important to man)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(panda, be important to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(panda, be important to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, be important to man)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(panda, be important to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(panda, be important to man)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, be important to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(giant panda, be important to man)