giant panda: is are poached

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.68
, endangered species
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, mammal
Weight: 0.62
, bear
Weight: 0.60
Siblings red panda
Weight: 0.80
, panda
Weight: 0.40
, panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, orangutan
Weight: 0.37
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is are poached 1.00
is are hunted for 0.79
being are hunted 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is are poached)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(giant panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(red panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(red panda, is are poached)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(giant panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(giant panda, is are poached)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(giant panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(giant panda, being are hunted)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(giant panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(giant panda, being are hunted)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(giant panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(giant panda, is are hunted for)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(giant panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is are hunted for)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(giant panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, being are hunted)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(giant panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(giant panda, is are hunted for)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(giant panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(giant panda, being are hunted)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(giant panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(giant panda, is are hunted for)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(giant panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(giant panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is are poached)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(giant panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(giant panda, is are poached)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(red panda, is are poached)