red panda: is are poached

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents giant panda
Weight: 0.80
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, endangered species
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, monkey
Weight: 0.60
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, red fox
Weight: 0.38
, red squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is are poached 1.00
is poached 0.95
get poached 0.94
is are hunted 0.79
be are protected 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(giant panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(red panda, is are poached)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(giant panda, is are poached)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is are poached)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(giant panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(red panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(red panda, is are poached)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(red panda, is are poached)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(red panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(red panda, is poached)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(red panda, is poached)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(red panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(red panda, is poached)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(red panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(red panda, is are hunted)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(red panda, is are hunted)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(red panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red panda, is are hunted)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(red panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(red panda, be are protected)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(red panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is are hunted)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(red panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is poached)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(red panda, be are protected)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(red panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(red panda, be are protected)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(red panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be are protected)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(red panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(red panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is are poached)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(red panda, is are poached)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(giant panda, is are poached)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(red panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(giant panda, is are poached)