red panda: is poached

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents giant panda
Weight: 0.80
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, endangered species
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, monkey
Weight: 0.60
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, red fox
Weight: 0.38
, red squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is poached 1.00
get poached 0.98
is are poached 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(giant panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(red panda, is poached)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(red panda, is poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(giant panda, is are poached)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is are poached)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(giant panda, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red panda, is poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(red panda, is poached)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(red panda, is poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(red panda, is poached)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red panda, is poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is are poached)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(red panda, is poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(red panda, is are poached)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(red panda, is poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(red panda, is are poached)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(red panda, is poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(red panda, is are poached)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(red panda, is poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(red panda, is poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is poached)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(red panda, is poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(red panda, is poached)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(giant panda, is are poached)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(red panda, is poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(giant panda, is are poached)