giant: be depicted as slow moving

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.64
, monster
Weight: 0.62
, company
Weight: 0.61
, team
Weight: 0.56
, brand
Weight: 0.54
Siblings siemens
Weight: 0.59
, boeing
Weight: 0.57
, cyclops
Weight: 0.53
, mitsubishi
Weight: 0.50
, aetna
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
be depicted as slow moving 1.00
be depicted as slow 0.95
move slow 0.82
is slow 0.81
be shown slow 0.81
be shown really slow 0.81
be perceived to super slow 0.80
be thought slow 0.79
move in slow motion 0.79
be in movies slow 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(monster, move in slow motion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(giant, be depicted as slow moving)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(giant, be depicted as slow moving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(monster, move in slow motion)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(giant, be depicted as slow moving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(monster, move in slow motion)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(monster, move in slow motion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(giant, be depicted as slow moving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(giant, be depicted as slow moving)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(giant, be depicted as slow moving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(giant, be depicted as slow moving)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(giant, be depicted as slow moving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(giant, be depicted as slow)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(giant, be depicted as slow moving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(giant, be depicted as slow)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(giant, be depicted as slow moving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant, be depicted as slow)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(giant, be depicted as slow moving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(giant, be depicted as slow)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(giant, be depicted as slow moving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(giant, move slow)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(giant, be depicted as slow moving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(giant, be depicted as slow moving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(giant, be depicted as slow moving)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(giant, be depicted as slow moving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(giant, be depicted as slow moving)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(giant, be depicted as slow moving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(monster, move in slow motion)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(giant, be depicted as slow moving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(monster, move in slow motion)