giant: hate big mom

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.64
, monster
Weight: 0.62
, company
Weight: 0.61
, team
Weight: 0.56
, brand
Weight: 0.54
Siblings siemens
Weight: 0.59
, boeing
Weight: 0.57
, cyclops
Weight: 0.53
, mitsubishi
Weight: 0.50
, aetna
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
hate big mom 1.00
is big 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(monster, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(giant, hate big mom)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(giant, hate big mom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(monster, is big)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(giant, hate big mom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(monster, is big)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(monster, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(giant, hate big mom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(giant, hate big mom)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(giant, hate big mom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(giant, hate big mom)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(giant, hate big mom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(giant, is big)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(giant, hate big mom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(giant, is big)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(giant, hate big mom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(giant, is big)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(giant, hate big mom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(giant, is big)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(giant, hate big mom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(giant, hate big mom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(giant, hate big mom)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(giant, hate big mom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(giant, hate big mom)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(giant, hate big mom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(monster, is big)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(giant, hate big mom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(monster, is big)