giant: is big

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.64
, monster
Weight: 0.62
, company
Weight: 0.61
, team
Weight: 0.56
, brand
Weight: 0.54
Siblings siemens
Weight: 0.59
, boeing
Weight: 0.57
, cyclops
Weight: 0.53
, mitsubishi
Weight: 0.50
, aetna
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
is big 1.00
hate big mom 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(monster, is big)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(giant, is big)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(giant, is big)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(monster, is big)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(giant, is big)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(monster, is big)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(monster, is big)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(giant, is big)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(giant, is big)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(giant, is big)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(giant, is big)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(giant, is big)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(giant, hate big mom)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(giant, is big)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(giant, hate big mom)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(giant, is big)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(giant, hate big mom)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(giant, is big)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(giant, hate big mom)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(giant, is big)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(giant, is big)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(giant, is big)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(giant, is big)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(giant, is big)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(giant, is big)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(monster, is big)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(giant, is big)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(monster, is big)