gin: be served in glass

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.66
, cocktail
Weight: 0.60
, spirit
Weight: 0.57
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.56
, product
Weight: 0.54
Siblings lager
Weight: 0.36
, brandy
Weight: 0.36
, cider
Weight: 0.36
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.36
, rum
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be served in glass 1.00
be served in large glass 0.97
go in glass 0.85
be served on days 0.85
be placed in glass 0.84
be served warm 0.84
be better in glass 0.84
be served on hot days 0.83
be best served ice cold 0.82
be served in snifter 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(drink, be better in glass)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(gin, be served in glass)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(drink, be placed in glass)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(gin, be served in glass)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(drink, be placed in glass)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(drink, be better in glass)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(drink, be better in glass)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(drink, be placed in glass)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(lager, go in glass)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be served warm)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be served in snifter)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(drink, be placed in glass)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(gin, be served in glass)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(drink, be better in glass)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(gin, be served in glass)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(lager, go in glass)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(lager, go in glass)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(brandy, be served in snifter)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(brandy, be served in snifter)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(brandy, be served warm)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(gin, be served in glass)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(gin, be served in large glass)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(gin, be served in large glass)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(gin, be served in large glass)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(gin, be served in large glass)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(gin, be served in glass)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(gin, be served in glass)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(drink, be placed in glass)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(drink, be better in glass)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(lager, go in glass)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(brandy, be served warm)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(brandy, be served in snifter)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(drink, be placed in glass)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(gin, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(drink, be better in glass)