giraffe: has physical part horns

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.70
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.64
, species
Weight: 0.61
Siblings wildebeest
Weight: 0.53
, elephant
Weight: 0.38
, lizard
Weight: 0.38
, zebra
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part horns 1.00
has physical part ears 0.82
has physical part tail 0.80
has physical part tails 0.80
has physical part teeth 0.79
has physical part antlers 0.79
has physical part hooves 0.78
has physical part legs 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(giraffe, has physical part horns)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(giraffe, has physical part horns)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(monkey, has physical part tail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(giraffe, has physical part horns)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(giraffe, has physical part horns)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(elephant, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(elephant, has physical part ears)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(monkey, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(monkey, has physical part tail)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(lizard, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(monkey, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(elephant, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(elephant, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(giraffe, has physical part horns)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(giraffe, has physical part teeth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(giraffe, has physical part teeth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(giraffe, has physical part legs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(giraffe, has physical part tail)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(giraffe, has physical part teeth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(giraffe, has physical part tail)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(giraffe, has physical part legs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part tail)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(giraffe, has physical part tail)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part teeth)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(giraffe, has physical part legs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part legs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part horns)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(giraffe, has physical part horns)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(elephant, has physical part ears)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(monkey, has physical part tail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(elephant, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(giraffe, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)