giraffe: has physical part tongues

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.70
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.64
, species
Weight: 0.61
Siblings wildebeest
Weight: 0.53
, elephant
Weight: 0.38
, lizard
Weight: 0.38
, zebra
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tongues 1.00
has tongues 0.94
has shape tongues 0.93
have long tongues 0.93
do have tongues 0.93
get tongues 0.93
has physical part tongue 0.91
have black tongues 0.91
get black tongues 0.90
have blue tongues 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(lizard, have blue tongues)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(giraffe, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(lizard, have blue tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(lizard, have blue tongues)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(giraffe, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(giraffe, has physical part tongues)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(giraffe, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(giraffe, has physical part tongue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(giraffe, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(giraffe, has physical part tongue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(giraffe, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(giraffe, has physical part tongue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, have blue tongues)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part tongue)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, have long tongues)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(giraffe, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(giraffe, have long tongues)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(giraffe, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(giraffe, have long tongues)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(giraffe, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(giraffe, have blue tongues)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(giraffe, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(giraffe, have blue tongues)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(giraffe, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(giraffe, have long tongues)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(giraffe, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(giraffe, have blue tongues)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(giraffe, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(giraffe, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part tongues)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(giraffe, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(giraffe, has physical part tongues)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(lizard, have blue tongues)