glamor: has physical part nails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents illusion
Weight: 0.36
, film
Weight: 0.31
Siblings reality
Weight: 0.26
, glitter
Weight: 0.26
, movie star
Weight: 0.26
, glory
Weight: 0.26
, star war
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part nails 1.00
has physical part teeth 0.88
has physical part hair 0.85
has physical part heads 0.79
has physical part holes 0.78
have white teeth 0.75
have perfect teeth 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(glamor, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(movie star, has physical part teeth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(glamor, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(glory, has physical part holes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(glamor, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(movie star, has physical part hair)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(glamor, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(movie star, have white teeth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(glamor, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(movie star, has physical part heads)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(glamor, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(movie star, have perfect teeth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(glamor, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(movie star, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(movie star, has physical part hair)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(glamor, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(movie star, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(movie star, has physical part teeth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(glamor, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(movie star, has physical part heads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(movie star, has physical part heads)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(glamor, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(glory, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(glory, has physical part holes)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(glamor, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(movie star, have perfect teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(movie star, have perfect teeth)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(glamor, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(movie star, have white teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(movie star, have white teeth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(glamor, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(glamor, has physical part nails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(glamor, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(glamor, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(glamor, has physical part nails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(glamor, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(glamor, has physical part nails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(glamor, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(movie star, has physical part teeth)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(glamor, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(movie star, has physical part hair)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(glamor, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(movie star, has physical part heads)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(glamor, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(glory, has physical part holes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(glamor, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(movie star, have perfect teeth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(glamor, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(movie star, have white teeth)