glass: break

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents safety glass
Weight: 0.74
, barrier
Weight: 0.64
, wall
Weight: 0.64
, raw material
Weight: 0.62
, liquid
Weight: 0.61
Siblings windshield
Weight: 0.35
, liquid water
Weight: 0.34
, liquid crystal
Weight: 0.34
, aluminum
Weight: 0.34
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
break 1.00
break in water 0.91
breaking of is physical change 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(glass, break) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, break)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(glass, break) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(aluminum, break) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(aluminum, break)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(glass, break) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(glass, break)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(glass, break) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(glass, break in water)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(glass, break) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(glass, break in water)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(glass, break) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(glass, break in water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(glass, break) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(glass, break in water)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(glass, break) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(glass, breaking of is physical change)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(glass, break) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(glass, breaking of is physical change)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(glass, break) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(glass, breaking of is physical change)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(glass, break) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(glass, breaking of is physical change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(glass, break) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(glass, break) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(glass, break)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(glass, break) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(glass, break)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(glass, break) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(aluminum, break)