glass: break in water

Related concepts

Parents	safety glass Weight: 0.74 , barrier Weight: 0.64 , wall Weight: 0.64 , raw material Weight: 0.62 , liquid Weight: 0.61
Siblings	windshield Weight: 0.35 , liquid water Weight: 0.34 , liquid crystal Weight: 0.34 , aluminum Weight: 0.34 , wood pulp Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
break in water	1.00
break	0.91
breaking of is physical change	0.78
break in freezer	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(glass, break in water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(aluminum, break)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(glass, break in water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(aluminum, break) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(aluminum, break)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(glass, break in water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Salient(glass, break in water)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(glass, break in water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(glass, break)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.04

Salient(glass, break in water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Salient(glass, break)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(glass, break in water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(glass, break in freezer)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.04

Salient(glass, break in water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Salient(glass, break in freezer)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(glass, break in water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(glass, break)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(glass, break in water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(glass, break in freezer)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(glass, break in water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(glass, breaking of is physical change)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.04

Salient(glass, break in water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(glass, breaking of is physical change)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(glass, break in water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(glass, break in freezer)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(glass, break in water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(glass, break)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(glass, break in water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(glass, breaking of is physical change)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(glass, break in water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(glass, breaking of is physical change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.04

Salient(glass, break in water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(glass, break in water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(glass, break in water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(glass, break in water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(glass, break in water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(glass, break in water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(aluminum, break)