global warming: affect animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crisis
Weight: 0.71
, technology
Weight: 0.66
, air pollution
Weight: 0.65
Siblings nuclear war
Weight: 0.65
, arctic
Weight: 0.51
, carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33
, computer science
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect animals 1.00
affect habitats of animals 0.88
affect elephants 0.86
affect animals in oceans 0.86
affect wildlife 0.85
affect snakes 0.84
affect wildife 0.84
threaten lives of antarctic animals 0.83
affect insects 0.82
affect tigers 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(air pollution, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(global warming, affect animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(global warming, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(air pollution, affect animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(global warming, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, affect animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(air pollution, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(global warming, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(global warming, affect animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(global warming, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(global warming, affect animals)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(global warming, affect animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(global warming, affect wildlife)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(global warming, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(global warming, affect wildlife)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(global warming, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(global warming, affect wildlife)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(global warming, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(global warming, affect wildlife)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(global warming, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(global warming, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(global warming, affect animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(global warming, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(global warming, affect animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(global warming, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(air pollution, affect animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(global warming, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(air pollution, affect animals)