goal: affect organisational growth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field goal
Weight: 0.65
, step
Weight: 0.61
, point
Weight: 0.61
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
Siblings target
Weight: 0.62
, survival
Weight: 0.59
, retribution
Weight: 0.59
, fitness
Weight: 0.58
, hat trick
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect organisational growth 1.00
affect growth 1.00
become growth industry 0.84
affect energy levels 0.77
increase from h2s h2te 0.76
increase going 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(point, increase from h2s h2te)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(goal, affect organisational growth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(goal, affect organisational growth)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(point, increase from h2s h2te)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(goal, affect organisational growth)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(point, increase from h2s h2te)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(goal, affect organisational growth)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fitness, become growth industry)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(goal, affect organisational growth)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(fitness, affect energy levels)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(point, increase from h2s h2te)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(goal, affect organisational growth)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(goal, affect organisational growth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(goal, affect organisational growth)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(fitness, affect energy levels)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fitness, affect energy levels)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(goal, affect organisational growth)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(fitness, become growth industry)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(fitness, become growth industry)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(goal, affect organisational growth)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(goal, affect organisational growth)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(goal, affect organisational growth)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(goal, affect growth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(goal, affect organisational growth)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(goal, affect growth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(goal, affect organisational growth)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(goal, affect growth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(goal, affect organisational growth)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(goal, affect growth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(goal, affect organisational growth)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(goal, affect organisational growth)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(goal, affect organisational growth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(goal, affect organisational growth)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(goal, affect organisational growth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(goal, affect organisational growth)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(point, increase from h2s h2te)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(goal, affect organisational growth)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fitness, affect energy levels)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(goal, affect organisational growth)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fitness, become growth industry)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(goal, affect organisational growth)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(point, increase from h2s h2te)