goiter: be more of dietary problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thyroid problem
Weight: 0.66
, disease
Weight: 0.54
, symptom
Weight: 0.52
, problem
Weight: 0.50
, consequence
Weight: 0.48
Siblings hypothyroidism
Weight: 0.36
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.35
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.35
, irritable bowel syndrome
Weight: 0.34
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more of dietary problem 1.00
be in diet of many people 0.83
be in diet of people 0.83
be more of problem 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(problem, be in diet of many people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(goiter, be more of dietary problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(goiter, be more of dietary problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(problem, be in diet of many people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(goiter, be more of dietary problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in diet of many people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(problem, be in diet of many people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(goiter, be more of dietary problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(goiter, be more of dietary problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(goiter, be more of dietary problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(goiter, be more of dietary problem)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(goiter, be more of dietary problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(goiter, be more of problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(goiter, be more of dietary problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(goiter, be more of problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(goiter, be more of dietary problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(goiter, be more of problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(goiter, be more of dietary problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(goiter, be more of problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(goiter, be more of dietary problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(goiter, be more of dietary problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(goiter, be more of dietary problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(goiter, be more of dietary problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(goiter, be more of dietary problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(goiter, be more of dietary problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(problem, be in diet of many people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(goiter, be more of dietary problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(problem, be in diet of many people)