goiter: be more of problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thyroid problem
Weight: 0.66
, disease
Weight: 0.54
, symptom
Weight: 0.52
, problem
Weight: 0.50
, consequence
Weight: 0.48
Siblings hypothyroidism
Weight: 0.36
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.35
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.35
, irritable bowel syndrome
Weight: 0.34
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more of problem 1.00
has state problem 0.90
be different from problems 0.85
be research problem 0.83
be uncommon problem in us 0.81
were such problem during war 0.81
is issue 0.78
be such problem in africa 0.78
be more of dietary problem 0.76
be cause for concern 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(goiter, be more of problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(disease, be such problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(goiter, be more of problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(problem, be research problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(disease, be such problem in africa)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(disease, be such problem in africa)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hypothyroidism, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(goiter, be more of problem)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(disease, be such problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(goiter, be more of problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(hypothyroidism, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hypothyroidism, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(goiter, be more of problem)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(goiter, has state problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(goiter, has state problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(goiter, has state problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(goiter, be uncommon problem in us)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(goiter, be uncommon problem in us)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(goiter, be uncommon problem in us)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(goiter, be more of dietary problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(goiter, has state problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(goiter, be more of dietary problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(goiter, be uncommon problem in us)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(goiter, be more of dietary problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(goiter, be more of dietary problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(goiter, be more of problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(goiter, be more of problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(disease, be such problem in africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hypothyroidism, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(goiter, be more of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(disease, be such problem in africa)