gold: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heavy metal
Weight: 0.70
, medal
Weight: 0.64
, mineral
Weight: 0.63
, metal
Weight: 0.63
, gift
Weight: 0.62
Siblings emerald
Weight: 0.54
, silver
Weight: 0.39
, copper
Weight: 0.38
, rhenium
Weight: 0.37
, platinum
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(metal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(gold, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(heavy metal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(gold, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(gold, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gift, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(heavy metal, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(metal, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(metal, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gift, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(copper, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(silver, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(metal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(gold, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(heavy metal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(gold, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(gold, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(silver, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(silver, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(copper, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(copper, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(gold, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(gold, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(gold, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(heavy metal, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(metal, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(silver, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(copper, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(heavy metal, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(gold, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(metal, has quality good)