metal: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, conductor
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, hard rock
Weight: 0.62
, material
Weight: 0.61
Siblings beryllium
Weight: 0.72
, tantalum
Weight: 0.71
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.69
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.68
, cobalt
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
be of quality 0.90
has quality use 0.88
be of high quality 0.86
has quality wrong 0.85
has quality making 0.84
has quality cost 0.82
has quality news 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(conductor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(metal, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(commodity, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(metal, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(conductor, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(commodity, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(conductor, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(commodity, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(beryllium, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(conductor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(metal, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(commodity, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(metal, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(heavy metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(heavy metal, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(heavy metal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(heavy metal, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(beryllium, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(beryllium, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(heavy metal, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(heavy metal, has quality wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(metal, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(metal, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(metal, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(commodity, has quality news)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(conductor, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(heavy metal, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(heavy metal, has quality wrong)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beryllium, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(heavy metal, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(conductor, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(commodity, has quality news)