golden eagle: be like animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents eagle
Weight: 0.89
, bald eagle
Weight: 0.81
, bird
Weight: 0.73
, raptor
Weight: 0.70
, species
Weight: 0.67
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38
, blue bird
Weight: 0.37
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.37
, heron
Weight: 0.37
, great blue heron
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be like animals 1.00
be like other animals 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(golden eagle, be like animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(golden eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(eagle, be like animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(golden eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(eagle, be like animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(golden eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(golden eagle, be like animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(golden eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(golden eagle, be like animals)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(golden eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(golden eagle, be like other animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(golden eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(golden eagle, be like other animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(golden eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(golden eagle, be like other animals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(golden eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(golden eagle, be like other animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(golden eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(golden eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(golden eagle, be like animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(golden eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(golden eagle, be like animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(golden eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(eagle, be like animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(golden eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(eagle, be like animals)