eagle: be like animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.67
, predator
Weight: 0.64
, wildlife
Weight: 0.58
, symbol
Weight: 0.58
Siblings golden eagle
Weight: 0.89
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, owl
Weight: 0.36
, heron
Weight: 0.36
, blue bird
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be like animals 1.00
be like other animals 0.97
be like other birds 0.87
be like birds 0.87
catch animals 0.85
be different from other birds 0.83
eat other birds 0.82
be different from birds 0.82
eat birds 0.80
is birds 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(bird, eat birds)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(eagle, be like animals)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, is birds)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(eagle, be like animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bird, is birds)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(bird, eat birds)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(bird, eat birds)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bird, is birds)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(golden eagle, be like other animals)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(golden eagle, be like animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(bird, eat birds)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(eagle, be like animals)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, is birds)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(eagle, be like animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(golden eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(golden eagle, be like animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(golden eagle, be like other animals)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(golden eagle, be like other animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(eagle, be like animals)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(eagle, be like birds)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(eagle, catch animals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(eagle, be like birds)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(eagle, is birds)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(eagle, catch animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(eagle, is birds)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(eagle, is birds)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(eagle, catch animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(eagle, be like birds)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(eagle, catch animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(eagle, is birds)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(eagle, be like birds)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(eagle, be like animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(eagle, be like animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bird, is birds)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bird, eat birds)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(golden eagle, be like animals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(golden eagle, be like other animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bird, is birds)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(eagle, be like animals)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bird, eat birds)