golfer: wear two pants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.56
, person
Weight: 0.50
, sportsman
Weight: 0.49
, golf club
Weight: 0.49
Siblings tennis player
Weight: 0.36
, football player
Weight: 0.35
, hockey player
Weight: 0.35
, soccer player
Weight: 0.35
, wrestler
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear two pants 1.00
wear pants 0.97
wear to pair of pants 0.97
wear white pants 0.96
wear two sets of pants 0.94
wear shorts 0.89
wear two shirts 0.89
wear clothes 0.87
have wear 0.86
wear skirts 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, wear shorts)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, wear skirts)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, wear shorts)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, have wear)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, have wear)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(tennis player, have wear)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(tennis player, have wear)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(soccer player, have wear)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(soccer player, have wear)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(soccer player, wear shorts)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soccer player, wear shorts)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(hockey player, wear shorts)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(hockey player, wear shorts)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(tennis player, wear skirts)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(tennis player, wear skirts)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(golfer, wear two pants)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(golfer, wear pants)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(golfer, wear pants)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(golfer, wear pants)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(golfer, wear shorts)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(golfer, wear shorts)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(golfer, wear shorts)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear shorts)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear pants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear two pants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(golfer, wear two pants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(tennis player, have wear)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(soccer player, have wear)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tennis player, wear skirts)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(hockey player, wear shorts)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(golfer, wear two pants)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(soccer player, wear shorts)