tennis player: have wear

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.78
, player
Weight: 0.69
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, sport
Weight: 0.62
Siblings football player
Weight: 0.42
, hockey player
Weight: 0.42
, soccer player
Weight: 0.41
, baseball player
Weight: 0.40
, lacrosse player
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
have wear 1.00
wear white 0.90
wear pink 0.88
wear socks 0.86
wear pink at us 0.86
wear green 0.86
wear long socks 0.85
wear same outfit 0.84
wear outfit 0.84
wear skirts 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(player, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(tennis player, have wear)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(athlete, wear green) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(tennis player, have wear)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(athlete, wear green)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(player, wear white)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(athlete, wear green)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(player, wear white)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, wear skirts)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(football player, wear socks)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(football player, wear long socks)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, wear white)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, wear green)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, have wear)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(player, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(tennis player, have wear)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(athlete, wear green) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(tennis player, have wear)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(soccer player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(soccer player, have wear)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(lacrosse player, wear skirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(lacrosse player, wear skirts)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(baseball player, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(baseball player, wear white)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(baseball player, wear green) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(baseball player, wear green)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(football player, wear socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(football player, wear socks)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(football player, wear long socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(football player, wear long socks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(tennis player, have wear)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, wear white)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, wear skirts)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, wear same outfit)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(tennis player, wear same outfit)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(tennis player, wear skirts)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(tennis player, wear same outfit)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(tennis player, wear white)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(tennis player, wear same outfit)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(tennis player, wear skirts)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(tennis player, wear white)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tennis player, wear skirts)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tennis player, wear white)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, have wear)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(tennis player, have wear)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(athlete, wear green)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(player, wear white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(lacrosse player, wear skirts)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(soccer player, have wear)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(football player, wear socks)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(baseball player, wear green)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(football player, wear long socks)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(baseball player, wear white)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(player, wear white)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(tennis player, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(athlete, wear green)