google: be much better than answerscom

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web page
Weight: 0.68
, web site
Weight: 0.67
, web browser
Weight: 0.65
, url
Weight: 0.64
Siblings wikipedia
Weight: 0.38
, web
Weight: 0.36
, yahoo
Weight: 0.36
, aol
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be much better than answerscom 1.00
be much better than anwerscom 1.00
be much better than askcom 1.00
has quality better 0.84
get worse 0.81
be poorer than apple 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(google, be much better than answerscom)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(google, be much better than anwerscom)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(google, be much better than askcom)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(google, be much better than askcom)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(google, be much better than anwerscom)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(google, be much better than askcom)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(google, be much better than anwerscom)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(google, get worse)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(google, be much better than askcom)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(google, get worse)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(google, be much better than anwerscom)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(google, has quality better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(google, be poorer than apple)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(google, get worse)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(google, be poorer than apple)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(google, be poorer than apple)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(google, get worse)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(google, has quality better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(google, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(google, be poorer than apple)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(google, be much better than answerscom)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(google, be much better than answerscom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(google, be much better than answerscom)