graffiti: be good for community

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents street
Weight: 0.47
, expression
Weight: 0.39
, restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, work
Weight: 0.35
, part
Weight: 0.35
Siblings street sign
Weight: 0.31
, alley
Weight: 0.29
, driveway
Weight: 0.28
, boulevard
Weight: 0.28
, sign language
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for community 1.00
be bad for community 0.97
be good for environment 0.81
be bad for environment 0.77
is good thing 0.76
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expression, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(graffiti, be good for community)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(street, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(graffiti, be good for community)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(graffiti, be good for community)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(work, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(street, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(expression, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(expression, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(work, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sign language, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expression, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(graffiti, be good for community)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(street, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(graffiti, be good for community)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(graffiti, be good for community)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(sign language, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sign language, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(graffiti, be good for community)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(graffiti, be good for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(graffiti, be good for environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(graffiti, is good thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(graffiti, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(graffiti, has quality good)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(graffiti, be good for community)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(graffiti, be good for community)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(street, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(expression, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sign language, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(street, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(graffiti, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(expression, has quality good)