grain: be good bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.70
, raw material
Weight: 0.68
, crop
Weight: 0.65
, ingredient
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cereal grain
Weight: 0.84
, grain elevator
Weight: 0.75
, wild rice
Weight: 0.74
, wheat germ
Weight: 0.73
, wheat flour
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good bad 1.00
go bad 0.91
has quality bad 0.87
has quality good 0.83
be bad for dogs 0.78
be free bad for dogs 0.77
was given to poor 0.76
be bad for cats 0.76
be good for dogs 0.76
has quality better 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(wheat flour, go bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(wheat flour, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(wheat flour, be bad for dogs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(wheat flour, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(wheat flour, go bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(wheat flour, go bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(wheat flour, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(wheat flour, be bad for dogs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(wheat flour, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(wheat flour, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(wheat flour, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(wheat flour, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(grain, be good bad)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(grain, be bad for dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(grain, be bad for cats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(grain, be bad for dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(grain, be bad for cats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(grain, be bad for cats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(grain, be bad for dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(grain, be free bad for dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(grain, be free bad for dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(grain, be free bad for dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(grain, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(grain, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(grain, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(grain, be good for dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(grain, be good for dogs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(grain, be good for dogs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(grain, be bad for cats)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(grain, be free bad for dogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(grain, be bad for dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(grain, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(grain, be good for dogs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(grain, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(grain, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(grain, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(grain, has quality better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(grain, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(grain, has quality better)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(grain, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(grain, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(grain, be good bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(grain, be good bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(wheat flour, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(wheat flour, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(wheat flour, be bad for dogs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(grain, be good bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(wheat flour, has quality better)