grain: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.70
, raw material
Weight: 0.68
, crop
Weight: 0.65
, ingredient
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cereal grain
Weight: 0.84
, grain elevator
Weight: 0.75
, wild rice
Weight: 0.74
, wheat germ
Weight: 0.73
, wheat flour
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
is quality 0.87
be good bad 0.87
has quality news 0.80
go bad 0.79
was given to poor 0.77
has quality resources 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(commodity, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(grain, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(commodity, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(commodity, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(wheat flour, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(wheat flour, has quality better)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(wheat flour, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(wheat flour, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(commodity, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(grain, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(wheat flour, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(wheat flour, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(wheat flour, go bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(wheat flour, go bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(wheat flour, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(wheat flour, has quality better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(wheat flour, is quality)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(wheat flour, is quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(grain, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(grain, be good bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(grain, be good bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(grain, be good bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(grain, be good bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(grain, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(grain, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(grain, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(grain, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(grain, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(grain, has quality better)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(grain, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(grain, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(grain, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(grain, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(commodity, has quality news)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(wheat flour, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(wheat flour, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(wheat flour, has quality better)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(wheat flour, is quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(grain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(commodity, has quality news)