grand slam: be important in tennis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents home run
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.61
, title
Weight: 0.58
, double
Weight: 0.54
Siblings wimbledon
Weight: 0.60
, slam dunk
Weight: 0.33
, gala
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in tennis 1.00
is tennis 0.97
be important to baseball players 0.80
is golf 0.80
is baseball 0.76
playing cricket 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(double, is tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(grand slam, be important in tennis)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(home run, be important to baseball players) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(grand slam, be important in tennis)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grand slam, be important in tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(double, is tennis)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grand slam, be important in tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(home run, be important to baseball players)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, be important in tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(double, is tennis)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, be important in tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(home run, be important to baseball players)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(double, is tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(grand slam, be important in tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(grand slam, be important in tennis)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(home run, be important to baseball players) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(grand slam, be important in tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(grand slam, be important in tennis)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grand slam, be important in tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(grand slam, be important in tennis)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grand slam, be important in tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(grand slam, is golf)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grand slam, be important in tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(grand slam, is baseball)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(grand slam, be important in tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(grand slam, is golf)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(grand slam, be important in tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(grand slam, is baseball)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(grand slam, be important in tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(grand slam, is golf)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(grand slam, be important in tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(grand slam, be important in tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, be important in tennis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grand slam, be important in tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(grand slam, be important in tennis)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, be important in tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(double, is tennis)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, be important in tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(home run, be important to baseball players)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(grand slam, be important in tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(double, is tennis)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(grand slam, be important in tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(home run, be important to baseball players)