grand slam: is golf

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents home run
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.61
, title
Weight: 0.58
, double
Weight: 0.54
Siblings wimbledon
Weight: 0.60
, slam dunk
Weight: 0.33
, gala
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is golf 1.00
is tennis 0.80
be important in tennis 0.80
is baseball 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(double, is tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(grand slam, is golf)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grand slam, is golf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(double, is tennis)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, is golf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(double, is tennis)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(double, is tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(grand slam, is golf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(grand slam, is golf)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grand slam, is golf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(grand slam, is golf)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(grand slam, is golf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, be important in tennis)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grand slam, is golf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(grand slam, be important in tennis)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(grand slam, is golf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(grand slam, be important in tennis)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grand slam, is golf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(grand slam, is baseball)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(grand slam, is golf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(grand slam, is baseball)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(grand slam, is golf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, is baseball)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(grand slam, is golf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(grand slam, is baseball)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(grand slam, is golf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(grand slam, be important in tennis)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(grand slam, is golf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(grand slam, is golf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, is golf)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grand slam, is golf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(grand slam, is golf)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(grand slam, is golf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(double, is tennis)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(grand slam, is golf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(double, is tennis)