granite: be better material for statue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stone
Weight: 0.74
, igneous rock
Weight: 0.66
, rock
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.59
Siblings marble
Weight: 0.39
, kidney stone
Weight: 0.38
, alabaster
Weight: 0.37
, quartz
Weight: 0.36
, concrete
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better material for statue 1.00
be more suitable than marble for statue in city centre 0.89
be more sustainable as statue 0.87
be more sustainable as statue in city centre 0.86
is good building material 0.79
be used as building material 0.77
is building material 0.77
be more suitable than marble 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(granite, be better material for statue)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(stone, is good building material)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(stone, is good building material)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(marble, is building material)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is good building material)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is building material)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(granite, be better material for statue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(concrete, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(concrete, is good building material)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(concrete, is building material)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(concrete, is building material)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(marble, is building material)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(marble, is building material)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(granite, be better material for statue)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(granite, be more suitable than marble for statue in city centre)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(granite, be more suitable than marble for statue in city centre)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(granite, be more sustainable as statue)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(granite, be more sustainable as statue in city centre)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(granite, be more sustainable as statue)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(granite, be more suitable than marble for statue in city centre)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(granite, be more sustainable as statue in city centre)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(granite, be more sustainable as statue)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(granite, be more sustainable as statue in city centre)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(granite, is good building material)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(granite, be more sustainable as statue in city centre)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(granite, be more suitable than marble for statue in city centre)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(granite, is good building material)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(granite, be used as building material)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(granite, be used as building material)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(granite, is building material)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(granite, is building material)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(granite, be more suitable than marble)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(granite, be used as building material)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(granite, is good building material)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(granite, is building material)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(granite, be more sustainable as statue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(granite, be more suitable than marble)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(granite, be more suitable than marble)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(granite, is good building material)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(granite, be more suitable than marble)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(granite, is building material)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(granite, be used as building material)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(granite, be better material for statue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(granite, be better material for statue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(stone, is good building material)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(concrete, is building material)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(marble, is building material)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(concrete, is good building material)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(granite, be better material for statue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(stone, is good building material)