grant: was easy on general lee with terms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.66
, benefit
Weight: 0.61
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, part
Weight: 0.60
Siblings application
Weight: 0.33
, contract
Weight: 0.32
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32
, stipulation
Weight: 0.32
, first aid kit
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was easy on general lee with terms 1.00
was easy on lee with terms 0.97
was easy on general lee 0.96
was easy on general lee with terms of agreement 0.94
was easy on lee with terms of agreement 0.91
was easy on lee 0.91
was effective in surrender of general lee in apomattox 0.85
was better able than lee 0.85
was effective in surrender of general lee 0.85
was effective in surrender of lee in apomattox 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(grant, was easy on lee with terms)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(grant, was effective in surrender of general lee in apomattox)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(grant, was effective in surrender of general lee)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(grant, was easy on lee with terms)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(grant, was easy on lee)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(grant, was effective in surrender of lee in apomattox)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(grant, was effective in surrender of general lee)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(grant, was easy on lee with terms)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(grant, was easy on lee with terms of agreement)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(grant, was effective in surrender of general lee in apomattox)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(grant, was easy on general lee)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(grant, was effective in surrender of lee in apomattox)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(grant, was easy on lee with terms)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(grant, was easy on general lee)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(grant, was better able than lee)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(grant, was easy on lee with terms of agreement)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(grant, was easy on lee with terms of agreement)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(grant, was easy on lee)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(grant, was better able than lee)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(grant, was easy on lee with terms of agreement)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(grant, was better able than lee)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(grant, was easy on lee)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(grant, was better able than lee)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(grant, was easy on lee)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(grant, was effective in surrender of general lee)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(grant, was effective in surrender of general lee in apomattox)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(grant, was effective in surrender of lee in apomattox)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(grant, was effective in surrender of general lee)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(grant, was effective in surrender of general lee in apomattox)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(grant, was effective in surrender of lee in apomattox)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)