grant: was easy on general lee with terms of agreement

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.66
, benefit
Weight: 0.61
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, part
Weight: 0.60
Siblings application
Weight: 0.33
, contract
Weight: 0.32
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32
, stipulation
Weight: 0.32
, first aid kit
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was easy on general lee with terms of agreement 1.00
was easy on lee with terms of agreement 0.98
was easy on general lee with terms 0.94
was easy on lee with terms 0.91
was easy on general lee 0.88
was easy on lee 0.83
was effective in surrender of general lee in apomattox 0.81
was effective in surrender of general lee 0.81
is agreements 0.79
was better able than lee 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(contract, is agreements)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(contract, is agreements)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(contract, is agreements)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(grant, was easy on lee with terms of agreement)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(grant, was easy on lee with terms)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(grant, was easy on lee with terms of agreement)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(grant, was easy on lee with terms)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(grant, was effective in surrender of general lee in apomattox)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(grant, was effective in surrender of general lee)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(grant, was easy on lee with terms of agreement)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(grant, was effective in surrender of general lee)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(grant, was easy on lee)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(grant, was easy on lee with terms of agreement)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(grant, was effective in surrender of general lee in apomattox)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(grant, was easy on lee with terms)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(grant, was easy on general lee)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(grant, was easy on general lee)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(grant, was better able than lee)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(grant, was easy on lee with terms)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(grant, was easy on lee)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(grant, was better able than lee)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(grant, was better able than lee)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(grant, was better able than lee)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(grant, was easy on lee)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(grant, was effective in surrender of general lee)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(grant, was easy on lee)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(grant, was effective in surrender of general lee)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(grant, was effective in surrender of general lee in apomattox)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(grant, was effective in surrender of general lee in apomattox)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(grant, was easy on general lee with terms of agreement)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(contract, is agreements)