grant: was taking turning point

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.66
, benefit
Weight: 0.61
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, part
Weight: 0.60
Siblings application
Weight: 0.33
, contract
Weight: 0.32
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32
, stipulation
Weight: 0.32
, first aid kit
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was taking turning point 1.00
was taking turning point in war 0.97
was taking turning point in civil war 0.90
was taking vicksburg 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(grant, was taking turning point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(grant, was taking turning point)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(grant, was taking turning point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(grant, was taking vicksburg)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(grant, was taking turning point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(grant, was taking vicksburg)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(grant, was taking turning point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(grant, was taking vicksburg)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(grant, was taking turning point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(grant, was taking turning point in war)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(grant, was taking turning point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(grant, was taking turning point in war)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(grant, was taking turning point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(grant, was taking turning point in civil war)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(grant, was taking turning point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(grant, was taking turning point in war)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(grant, was taking turning point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(grant, was taking vicksburg)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(grant, was taking turning point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(grant, was taking turning point in civil war)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(grant, was taking turning point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(grant, was taking turning point in war)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(grant, was taking turning point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(grant, was taking turning point in civil war)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(grant, was taking turning point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(grant, was taking turning point in civil war)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(grant, was taking turning point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(grant, was taking turning point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(grant, was taking turning point)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(grant, was taking turning point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(grant, was taking turning point)