grant: was taking turning point in war

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.66
, benefit
Weight: 0.61
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, part
Weight: 0.60
Siblings application
Weight: 0.33
, contract
Weight: 0.32
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32
, stipulation
Weight: 0.32
, first aid kit
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was taking turning point in war 1.00
was taking turning point 0.97
was taking turning point in civil war 0.95
was taking vicksburg 0.86
was in war 0.79
end war important 0.79
end war particularly important 0.78
end war 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(agreement, end war particularly important)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(grant, was taking turning point in war)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(agreement, end war important)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(grant, was taking turning point in war)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(agreement, end war)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(grant, was taking turning point in war)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(agreement, end war)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(agreement, end war important)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(agreement, end war particularly important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(agreement, end war)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(agreement, end war important)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(agreement, end war particularly important)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(agreement, end war particularly important)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(grant, was taking turning point in war)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(agreement, end war important)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(grant, was taking turning point in war)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(agreement, end war)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(grant, was taking turning point in war)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(grant, was taking turning point in war)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(grant, was taking turning point)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(grant, was taking vicksburg)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(grant, was taking vicksburg)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(grant, was taking vicksburg)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(grant, was taking turning point)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(grant, was taking turning point in civil war)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(grant, was taking turning point)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(grant, was taking turning point in civil war)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(grant, was taking vicksburg)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(grant, was taking turning point in civil war)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(grant, was taking turning point)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(grant, was taking turning point in civil war)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(grant, was taking turning point in war)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(grant, was taking turning point in war)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(agreement, end war important)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(agreement, end war)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(agreement, end war particularly important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(agreement, end war important)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(agreement, end war)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(grant, was taking turning point in war)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(agreement, end war particularly important)